How do you get compliant systems?
Provided the company is affected, each computer
system needs to be assessed for compliance, and brought into compliance.
Read more about case studies of Part 11
projects.
It might be wise first to create an inventory
of the systems in the company, and create a checklist of items
required in 21 CFR Part 11. Most companies probably have an inventory
list from Y2K, and this can form a basis for your Part 11 inventory.
1. Assess if the system itself needs to be in
compliance
Does it handle GxP data? GxP systems include
data that affects the quality of the products.
2. Check each system according to the checklist
Create an overview of where the problems are.
3. Create an action plan for each system
Some problems can be solved internally, others
need help from the vendor. Sometimes it is not possible to solve
the problems with the system. In that case an other system may
take over the job for this system, or a completely new system
must replace the existing. In that case, create a URS.
Solutions may include:
-
Writing to the vendor and hope that he can
help you with the technical non-compliance in the system.
This may be incorporated in the next version.
-
Create or change SOPs to include all procedural
requirements in 21 CFR Part 11. This should be done without
delay.
-
Validate all technical requirements set forth
in Part 11. Chances are that even if your system was validated,
some of these issues were missing during the testing. Validation
activites should be done without delay.
4. Create an overall action plan for your systems
It is probably not possible to fix all problems
quickly, as there are usually limited resources to do so. In that
case, make a priority list of the systems to be worked on. Priorities
are based risks: How important each system is for the company
and how much it is used. Start with the top system and work down
the list.
Want to know more?
Publications:
Segalstad: The WWW (Who-Why-What) of 21 CFR Part
11 Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures, European Pharmaceutical
Review Vol. 5 Issue 2 (2000) 69-74. Also published in American
Pharmaceutical Review Vol.3 Issue 4 Winter 2000-2001 (84-87)
Segalstad: Elektroniske data og elektronisk signatur,
(electronic data and electronic signatures) Kjemi, April 2001
(9-12)
Segalstad: Testplans according to 21 CFR Part
11, International Validation Technology (in press, probably in
fall 2003 issue)
Classes:
Classes are offered
on request, tailored to needs for in-house training in your company.
Websites:
21 CFR Part 11: www.fda.gov/ora